# Interventoría and supervision in Colombia: who oversees your contract, and with what powers > In Colombia a public contract is overseen by a supervisor or an interventor, and they are not the same. What each one does and what liability each one carries. - Author: Carlos Pérez (Comandos) — CEO of Paladio - Published: 2026-09-02 - Original: https://usepaladio.com/en/blog/interventoria-supervision-colombia/ - Guides --- The interventoría is the oversight that an independent party hired by the public entity performs over the fulfilment of a contract. Supervision is the oversight the entity itself performs when no specialised knowledge is required. They are different figures, with different origins and different scope, and confusing them is one of the most common causes of instructions that nobody later stands behind. > **Note:** check the current text of Law 1474 of 2011 and the contract rules that apply to your project. Article 83 of Law 1474 of 2011 establishes that, in order to protect administrative probity, prevent corruption and safeguard the transparency of contracting, public entities are required to permanently oversee the correct execution of the contracted object through a supervisor or an interventor, as applicable. ## The difference, concretely Supervision is the technical, administrative, financial, accounting and legal follow-up that the public entity itself performs over the fulfilment of the contract when no specialised knowledge is required. The interventoría is the technical follow-up performed by an independent party. | | Supervision | Interventoría | |---|---|---| | Who performs it | The entity itself, through appointed officials | An independent hired third party | | When it applies | Always, on any public contract | When specialised knowledge is required | | Base scope | Technical, administrative, financial, accounting and legal | Technical, plus whatever the contract adds | | Support | May hire support staff | Is itself a contractor | From articles 83 and 84 it follows that supervision will always exist on any public contract, unlike the interventoría, which depends on an analysis of its necessity and extent. And a point that causes frequent confusion: when the interventor is not entrusted with following the whole contract, the interventoría contract must state the technical activities in its charge, and the rest remain with the entity through the supervisor. The interventoría contract, in turn, is supervised directly by the entity. **Practical implication for the contractor:** many projects have both figures at the same time, with divided scopes. Knowing which of the two can resolve what is the difference between a valid instruction and one that nobody later owns. ## When the interventoría is mandatory Considering the entity's capacity to take on supervision in the works contracts referred to in article 32 of Law 80 of 1993, the preliminary studies of contracts whose value exceeds the entity's lowest procurement threshold must address the need for an interventoría, regardless of the selection procedure. In addition, in works contracts awarded through public tender, the interventoría must be hired from a party independent of both the contracting entity and the contractor. ## The liability that explains the behaviour This is the point that changes how the relationship on site should be read. Under the Single Disciplinary Code, as amended by Law 1474 of 2011, it is a most serious offence for the supervisor or the interventor not to demand the quality of the goods and services acquired by the entity, or that required by mandatory technical standards, or to certify as received to satisfaction work that has not been fully executed. Read it slowly: **certifying as received work that was not fully executed is a most serious disciplinary offence.** That explains why an interventor does not sign lightly, why they ask for evidence that seems excessive and why they refuse to accept what they could not verify. It is not distrust of you. They are protecting their professional licence and their disciplinary standing. There is an important limit in the opposite direction: **the works contractor's breach cannot be imputed to the interventor as if they were obliged to execute the work.** Their liability is for their own acts and omissions, not for yours. ## How to work with the interventoría **Clarify from the kick-off record who resolves what.** If there is both an interventor and a supervisor, request the division of powers in writing. Ten minutes at the start, weeks saved. **Everything that affects cost or schedule, in writing.** A verbal instruction from the interventor on something that alters scope is the fastest route to executing without getting paid. **Make verification easy instead of resisting it.** Give notice before work gets covered up. An interventor who was able to see the work signs; one who arrived late cannot. **Document the compliance, not just the observation.** An interventoría observation without record of having been addressed remains open and shows up at settlement. **Do not ask them to authorise what they cannot authorise.** Additional work, scope changes, higher amounts — those normally require the entity's decision. Pressing the interventor on something beyond their powers only sours the relationship. ## Frequently asked questions **Can the interventor order changes to the work?** Their core function is oversight and verification, not direction. Changes that alter scope, cost or schedule require the corresponding procedure before the entity. If you receive an instruction of that kind, ask for it in writing and check that it has backing. **Can I go directly to the entity if I disagree with the interventoría?** It depends on what was agreed and on the formal channel set in the contract. The prudent path is to leave written record of the disagreement with the interventoría first, then escalate through the established channel. **What if the interventoría does not answer within the deadlines?** Document every request with a filing number and date. A documented lack of response is a fact that supports later positions; an undocumented one is not. **Does the interventoría apply to private projects?** The figure in article 83 belongs to the public procurement regime. In private projects equivalent figures exist by contract, with the name and powers the parties define. Without a contractual definition, someone pays for the ambiguity. **Who supervises the interventor?** The entity, directly. It is one of the reasons the interventoría documents so much; evidence is demanded of them too.